Democratic sycophants: Duplicitous or just dumb?

Democratic sycophants: Duplicitous or just dumb? At the "Take Back America" conference, AKA “We Still Hate the U.S. Bongo Fest”, former Presidential waffler and Boston Brahman, John Kerry (AKA-“Is this where I buy me a hunt’in license?”) along with several other liberal intellegencia notables received an avalanche of cheers when they called for a date to be set for U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq. Movie star/Foreign-Service lightweight Joe Wilson called for this as well but cautioned Democrats from being baited into a vote for immediate withdrawal in a pending House Resolution. http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200606/POL20060615c.html

Ironically, left-wing darling Hillary Clinton seems to be taking the moderate position of agreeing with the President in not setting a definite date for essentially the same reasons that Bush has continually iterated. The logic of this seems to not be able to penetrate the hard-core leftists' hatred of Bush as they booed her on this single point at the conference. But logic and consistency is not one of their strong points, as a matter of fact, I believe it would be considered a disability, possibly covered by the ADA. Case-in-point would be Kerry’s waffling since the election of 2004 on his vote for the war in Iraq. At the conference he now apologizes for his vote; As no one who takes his own political philosophy and views seriously can be anything but amused by a person such as Kerry, one can only be entertained by his continual “nuancing”. Despite the entertainment value of watching the rutterless, graceless leftwing wax disingenuously about their motives for their otherwise duplicitous positions, one must keep in mind the left’s investment in our failure in all we do while anyone other than a Democrat has any say in foreign or domestic policy. Unfortunately real American lives are at stake while the subversive rhetoric is promulgated. Now we are beginning to learn that Zarqawi himself said the American media gave his operation more credit and standing than he himself thinks he deserved; And if what is beginning to come out is true, he seemed to think his efforts were faltering. This is outright scandalous when set against the remarks of many Democrats and media outlets of the past two years. This same aid and comfort 35 years ago by the media and leftist politicos is exactly what a Vietnamese General recently attributed their takeover of South Vietnam to. Conservative estimates for those killed directly and indirectly by the Vietcong after they took over the South are 1.5 million. John Kerry in the 1971 debate with Paul O’Neill on the Dick Cavett Show (http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/staticpages/index.php?page=20040510083458318 ) claimed 4 or 5 thousand people might be killed in political retribution if we left Vietnam. As history proves again, these leftist ideologues never get it right. Knowing this, there is only this question: Are their subversive statements political investments or mere stupidity? The former is certainly treasonous, but their logic leads me to believe their motives are half opportunistic and half stupidity. (The opportunism part counts on the stupidity of others.) Thomas Payne argued against the appeasement of the British, Lincoln would not appease the rebelling states, Churchill argued against the appeasement of the Nazi’s and Reagan refused to appease the Russian Communists. If these facts do not sufficiently persuade someone as to what free, thinking people think about appeasement then remember the fact that the U.S. allowed the appeasers to guide us out of Vietnam and millions died without an apology from a single vocal leftist.

Notes to self:
1. Don’t hide $90,000 in the freezer of your legislative office.
2. Don’t allow defense contractors to buy you a yacht or a condo.
3. Crashing your car, killing or raping someone or punching Congressional Security Staff in the face is not a criminal offense when you’re named Kennedy.
4. Change your name to Kennedy.